TABLE 3C. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF ZOYSIAGRASS (VEGETATIVE) CULTIVARS GROWN AT SIXTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. 1/ 1998 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AR1 CA3 FL1 FL3 GA1 IL2 IN1 KS1 KY1 LA1 MO1 MS1 SC1 TX1 TX3 VA4 MEAN EMERALD 2 5 8 1 2.5 3 4 1.0 6 8.0 2 3.0 2.5 1 6.0 6 1 DALZ 9601 1 3 7 8 5.0 2 6 2.0 7 2.0 4 1.0 2.5 6 8.0 1 2 EL TORO 6 6 1 2 8.0 9 3 4.5 1 4.5 1 7.5 6.5 3 4.0 5 3 ZEON 3 4 6 5 4.0 1 7 4.5 8 3.0 8 2.0 9.0 4 7.0 3 4 JAMUR 7 7 4 5 7.0 10 5 3.0 4 9.0 3 7.5 4.0 5 2.5 7 5 VICTORIA 8 1 3 3 1.0 5 10 10.5 . 4.5 9 5.0 5.0 7 5.0 2 6 DE ANZA 5 2 2 5 2.5 7 9 9.0 . 1.0 10 6.0 8.0 8 10.0 4 7 HT-210 9 8 9 9 9.0 4 11 10.5 . 7.0 11 4.0 1.0 2 2.5 8 8 J-14 10 11 10 10 11.0 8 1 8.0 2 11.0 6 11.0 6.5 9 9.0 11 9 MEYER 4 10 11 11 6.0 6 2 6.0 3 10.0 7 9.0 11.0 11 11.0 9 10 MIYAKO 11 9 5 7 10.0 11 8 7.0 5 6.0 5 10.0 10.0 10 1.0 10 11 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".