TABLE 5C.    RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF ZOYSIAGRASS (VEGETATIVE) CULTIVARS
                                                                  FOR EACH YEAR IN THE U.S.  1/
                                                                        1997-2000 DATA

                                                 QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/

                                                        NAME               1997  1998  1999  2000  MEAN

                                                        ZORRO (DALZ 9601)    2     2     1     1     1
                                                        EMERALD              4     1     2     2     2
                                                        ZEON                 5     4     3     3     3
                                                        EL TORO              1     3     4     4     4
                                                        JAMUR                3     5     5     5     5
                                                        VICTORIA            10     6     6     6     6
                                                        J-14                 6     9     8     9     7
                                                        DE ANZA              7     7     7     8     8
                                                        MEYER               11    10    10     7     9
                                                        MIYAKO               8    11     9    10    10
                                                        HT-210               9     8    11    11    11

 1/  THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR
     ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS.  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 4.

 2/  RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.
     FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".