TABLE 3A. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF ZOYSIAGRASS CULTIVARS GROWN AT SEVENTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. 1/ 1997-2000 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AR1 CA3 FL1 FL3 GA1 IL2 IN1 KS1 KY1 LA1 MD1 MO1 MS1 SC1 TX1 TX3 VA4 MEAN ZORRO (DALZ 9601) 1 3 7 8 1 1 7 2 10 3.0 1.0 2 2 4.0 3 13 1 1 EMERALD 2 5 6 4 2 3 2 1 14 6.0 15.0 1 3 2.5 1 4 7 2 ZEON 3 4 4 6 3 2 10 8 16 1.0 3.0 3 1 17.0 2 9 3 3 EL TORO 7 7 1 1 5 11 12 5 6 7.0 6.0 5 8 9.0 5 3 6 4 JAMUR 4 6 3 3 7 12 13 6 11 8.0 9.0 4 7 6.0 4 2 4 5 VICTORIA 8 1 8 2 4 5 18 15 17 5.0 11.0 15 5 8.0 7 10 2 6 J-14 10 14 13 10 17 9 4 11 7 13.5 7.0 8 13 12.0 8 14 14 7 DE ANZA 6 2 2 5 6 7 16 19 18 2.0 2.0 16 6 2.5 10 17 9 8 J-37 13 13 12 12 15 13 1 4 2 13.5 12.5 6 11 16.0 14 8 13 9 ZEN-400 12 12 10 13 10 14 5 3 1 12.0 8.0 7 10 11.0 13 16 16 10 MEYER 5 16 17 17 8 8 3 13 9 11.0 4.0 12 14 13.0 17 18 8 11 MIYAKO 9 10 5 7 13 17 14 12 13 9.0 12.5 9 9 10.0 9 1 12 12 J-36 14 . 11 11 14 16 8 9 5 18.0 5.0 11 16 7.0 12 12 15 13 ZENITH 16 9 19 16 9 10 11 10 4 16.0 10.0 14 12 15.0 11 7 11 14 ZEN-500 15 8 18 14 12 15 6 14 3 17.0 14.0 13 18 14.0 16 11 10 15 CHINESE COMMON 17 15 15 15 16 18 9 7 8 15.0 16.0 10 17 5.0 15 6 18 16 HT-210 11 11 9 9 11 4 19 18 19 4.0 19.0 19 4 1.0 6 5 5 17 KOREAN COMMON 18 18 16 18 19 19 15 17 12 19.0 17.0 17 19 19.0 18 15 19 18 Z-18 19 17 14 19 18 6 17 16 15 10.0 18.0 18 15 18.0 19 19 17 19 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".