PRELIMINARY DATA - NOT FOR PUBLICATION TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FOR TALL FESCUE CULTIVARS IN THE 2001 NATIONAL TALL FESCUE TEST 2002 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF STATISTICS FOR ALL LOCATIONS ALL LOCATIONS SUM OF HIGHEST LOWEST MAXIMUM NAME MEAN 1/ RANK 2/ RANKS 3/ RANK 4/ RANK 5/ RANK 6/ IN TOP 25% 7/ 01-ORU1 5.8 32 1711 33 2 155 46.2 01-RUTOR2 5.6 80 2039 62 5 152 30.8 01-TFOR3 5.4 140 2931 148 41 158 3.8 2ND MILLENNIUM 5.9 11 1229 5 5 125 57.7 ATF 586 5.4 143 2686 134 23 160 15.4 ATF 702 5.6 99 2476 114 17 156 7.7 ATF 704 5.5 116 2359 98 7 154 15.4 TULSA II (ATF 706) 5.4 145 2783 144 31 152 3.8 ATF 707 5.3 152 2986 150 20 156 3.8 ATF 799 5.6 90 2418 107 22 155 15.4 ATF 802 5.5 135 2776 143 24 149 7.7 ATF 806 5.3 149 3029 151 44 157 0.0 ATF-593 5.7 46 1844 43 9 137 19.2 ATF-800 5.5 104 2254 84 11 154 26.9 ATF-803 5.5 119 2494 116 7 144 15.4 B-7001 5.7 64 2097 69 2 147 11.5 BAR FA 1003 5.6 95 2264 86 23 159 19.2 BAR FA 1005 5.7 47 1874 47 4 156 42.3 BAR FA 1CR7 5.5 130 2656 132 4 157 7.7 BARLEXAS 5.5 127 2578 128 18 159 11.5 BARLEXAS II 5.6 93 2336 94 14 159 23.1 BARRERA 5.6 74 2238 83 5 144 19.2 BARRINGTON 5.6 88 2214 79 18 151 23.1 BE1 5.8 20 1291 8 5 133 46.2 BILTMORE 5.8 21 1810 40 8 158 38.5 BINGO 5.9 13 1552 21 2 141 34.6 BONSAI 5.0 159 3608 159 34 160 7.7 BRAVO 5.5 107 2445 108 11 154 7.7 CAS-157 5.7 50 1976 53 20 140 23.1 CAS-ED 5.6 93 2306 90 10 159 15.4 CAS-MC1 5.8 17 1493 17 1 141 46.2 CAYENNE 5.9 15 1529 18 1 159 46.2 CIS-TF-60 5.6 81 2289 88 3 160 26.9 CIS-TF-64 5.5 126 2717 138 34 156 11.5 CIS-TF-65 5.7 41 1907 50 3 141 23.1 CIS-TF-67 5.8 18 1551 20 4 146 46.2 CIS-TF-77 5.7 65 2113 72 9 156 15.4 COCHISE III (018) 5.9 12 1438 12 2 146 46.2 COYOTE 5.6 101 2375 101 12 156 19.2 DAYTONA (MRF 23) 5.5 120 2553 125 19 159 3.8 DLF-J210 5.5 129 2520 119 5 157 15.4 DLSD 5.9 9 1395 11 1 145 53.8 DOMINION 5.5 133 2474 113 31 156 7.7 DP 50-9082 5.0 158 3568 158 46 159 0.0 DP 50-9226 5.4 147 2851 145 34 160 3.8 PRELIMINARY DATA - NOT FOR PUBLICATION TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FOR TALL FESCUE CULTIVARS (CONT'D) IN THE 2001 NATIONAL TALL FESCUE TEST 2002 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF STATISTICS FOR ALL LOCATIONS ALL LOCATIONS SUM OF HIGHEST LOWEST MAXIMUM NAME MEAN 1/ RANK 2/ RANKS 3/ RANK 4/ RANK 5/ RANK 6/ IN TOP 25% 7/ DYNASTY 5.6 87 2255 85 4 157 26.9 EA 163 5.6 82 2216 80 3 157 23.1 ELISA 5.3 150 2728 140 1 159 19.2 ENDEAVOR 5.6 87 2236 82 10 150 19.2 F-4 6.0 1 1134 4 1 152 65.4 FALCON II 5.5 133 2580 129 4 154 11.5 FINESSE II 5.5 123 2547 124 1 160 11.5 FOCUS 5.7 48 1985 54 2 141 26.9 FORTE (BE-2) 5.8 26 1679 30 9 147 46.2 GO-FL3 5.1 157 3248 157 7 159 3.8 GO-OD2 5.7 61 2086 66 18 156 26.9 GO-RD4 5.3 152 3041 152 47 158 0.0 GO-SIU2 5.2 156 3234 156 34 159 3.8 GRANDE II 5.8 30 1456 13 3 146 46.2 JAGUAR 3 5.6 83 2184 78 3 141 19.2 JT-12 5.5 134 2717 138 46 159 0.0 JT-13 5.4 145 2771 142 23 159 7.7 JT-15 5.5 112 2540 123 31 157 7.7 JT-18 5.4 146 2616 130 24 159 7.7 JT-6 5.6 91 2349 95 12 159 23.1 JT-9 5.5 125 2486 115 2 159 15.4 JT-99 5.9 8 1473 14 2 155 46.2 JTTFF-2000 5.2 155 3068 153 30 159 7.7 JUSTICE (RB2-01) 6.0 2 1007 1 1 147 69.2 K01-8007 5.4 142 2769 141 24 160 15.4 K01-8015 5.8 19 1721 35 1 147 34.6 K01-E03 5.7 71 2353 97 1 148 26.9 K01-E09 5.6 96 2499 117 4 148 11.5 K01-WAF 6.0 6 1258 6 2 147 61.5 KALAHARI 5.7 45 2167 76 1 159 26.9 KITTY HAWK 2000 5.6 103 2463 112 6 145 15.4 KY-31 E+ 4.2 160 3937 160 33 160 3.8 L1Z 6.0 5 1285 7 2 144 53.8 LANCER 5.3 154 3190 155 9 159 11.5 LARAMIE 5.4 136 2637 131 22 154 7.7 LEGITIMATE 5.4 137 2724 139 7 159 15.4 DAVINCI (LTP-7801) 6.0 4 1359 9 1 156 50.0 MA 127 5.7 69 2124 73 6 141 26.9 MA 138 5.7 63 2021 60 7 145 23.1 MA 158 5.5 116 2518 118 9 152 3.8 MAGELLAN (OD-4) 5.8 24 1712 34 3 156 34.6 MASTERPIECE 5.8 38 1616 25 8 140 30.8 MATADOR 5.6 73 2055 64 24 138 15.4 MCN-RC 5.8 39 1758 37 11 148 38.5 MILLENNIUM 5.7 59 2031 61 1 156 23.1 PRELIMINARY DATA - NOT FOR PUBLICATION TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FOR TALL FESCUE CULTIVARS (CONT'D) IN THE 2001 NATIONAL TALL FESCUE TEST 2002 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF STATISTICS FOR ALL LOCATIONS ALL LOCATIONS SUM OF HIGHEST LOWEST MAXIMUM NAME MEAN 1/ RANK 2/ RANKS 3/ RANK 4/ RANK 5/ RANK 6/ IN TOP 25% 7/ MRF 210 5.5 124 2406 105 16 160 15.4 MRF 211 5.5 118 2524 120 17 158 15.4 MRF 24 5.4 139 2695 135 30 156 11.5 MRF 25 5.7 62 1991 56 5 135 19.2 MRF 26 5.6 102 2328 93 5 152 15.4 MRF 27 5.6 80 2182 77 11 157 15.4 MRF 28 5.5 117 2306 90 11 156 19.2 MRF 29 5.6 101 2533 121 12 155 15.4 MUSTANG 3 5.7 70 1995 57 9 157 34.6 NA-TDD 5.6 99 2415 106 2 159 11.5 OLYMPIC GOLD 5.8 34 1581 23 4 146 46.2 P-58 5.5 110 2536 122 3 156 15.4 PADRE (NJ4) 5.9 16 1609 24 1 144 38.5 PICASSO 5.8 26 1486 16 6 125 30.8 PICK TF H-97 5.5 123 2376 103 21 157 11.5 PICK ZMG 5.6 89 2272 87 16 155 15.4 PICK-00-AFA 5.7 61 1962 52 2 147 30.8 PICK-OD3-01 5.9 7 1111 2 2 103 61.5 PLANTATION 5.7 53 1990 55 9 157 34.6 PROSEEDS 5301 5.7 43 1764 38 2 159 26.9 PROSPECT 5.6 75 2109 70 4 142 23.1 PST-53T 5.6 78 2235 81 16 158 11.5 PST-57E 5.8 27 1698 32 7 156 34.6 PST-5A1 5.7 49 1848 44 4 150 23.1 PST-5BAB 5.7 67 2089 67 3 146 23.1 PST-5BZ 5.6 78 2162 75 17 153 15.4 PST-5FZD 5.7 56 2092 68 6 150 34.6 PST-5JM 5.7 66 2018 58 12 147 23.1 PST-5KI 5.6 95 2317 92 5 160 11.5 PST-5KU 5.5 111 2669 133 7 159 7.7 PST-5LO 5.7 57 2047 63 15 147 23.1 PST-5NAS 5.6 87 2312 91 19 157 23.1 PST-5S12 5.7 58 2077 65 17 146 19.2 PST-5T1 5.8 37 1849 45 4 156 42.3 PST-5TUO 5.5 114 2567 127 20 154 7.7 PST-DDL 5.6 84 2364 99 3 149 23.1 PURE GOLD 5.4 138 2701 136 10 157 11.5 QUEST 5.8 37 1868 46 4 141 23.1 R-4 6.0 3 1128 3 1 147 57.7 RAPTOR (CIS-TF-33) 5.8 32 1486 16 6 159 50.0 REBEL EXEDA 5.9 10 1390 10 2 150 50.0 REBEL SENTRY 5.7 40 1667 28 1 141 42.3 REMBRANDT 5.8 22 1617 26 3 147 46.2 RENDITION 5.8 28 1637 27 13 132 46.2 ROBERTS DOL 5.8 23 1823 41 5 143 42.3 PRELIMINARY DATA - NOT FOR PUBLICATION TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FOR TALL FESCUE CULTIVARS (CONT'D) IN THE 2001 NATIONAL TALL FESCUE TEST 2002 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF STATISTICS FOR ALL LOCATIONS ALL LOCATIONS SUM OF HIGHEST LOWEST MAXIMUM NAME MEAN 1/ RANK 2/ RANKS 3/ RANK 4/ RANK 5/ RANK 6/ IN TOP 25% 7/ ROBERTS SM4 5.7 52 1927 51 11 144 26.9 SBM 5.9 14 1568 22 7 155 50.0 SCORPION 5.6 72 2020 59 14 151 23.1 SIGNIA 5.5 129 2903 147 20 154 3.8 SILVERADO II (PST-578) 5.7 42 1827 42 15 132 23.1 SILVERSTAR (PST-5ASR) 5.8 33 1546 19 2 137 46.2 SOUTHERN CHOICE II 5.6 97 2380 104 1 156 19.2 SR 8250 5.5 107 2350 96 19 159 15.4 SR 8600 5.8 35 1675 29 10 138 38.5 SRX 805 5.5 105 2376 103 9 157 15.4 SR 8550 (SRX 8BE4) 5.7 68 2144 74 16 141 38.5 STETSON 5.3 153 3164 154 22 157 11.5 T991 5.3 148 2872 146 19 157 19.2 TAR HEEL 5.7 55 1776 39 3 133 38.5 TAR HEEL II (PST-5TR1) 5.7 45 1896 49 9 150 30.8 TEMPEST 5.5 108 2368 100 11 152 19.2 TF66 5.4 141 2963 149 58 157 0.0 TITAN LTD. 5.5 131 2463 112 7 157 15.4 TOMAHAWK RT 5.5 109 2449 109 20 152 19.2 TRACER 5.5 123 2564 126 23 157 11.5 UT-155 5.7 55 1883 48 11 151 30.8 UT-RB3 5.8 29 1691 31 2 141 34.6 WATCHDOG 5.6 76 2112 71 3 145 23.1 WOLFPACK 5.7 51 1751 36 5 147 30.8 WYATT 5.5 114 2462 110 9 153 11.5 LSD VALUE 0.2 C.V. (%) 9.5 1/ MEAN - AN AVERAGE OF ALL THE TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FROM ALL LOCATIONS. 2/ RANK - RANKING OF THE MEAN OF ALL QUALITY RATINGS. 3/ SUM OF RANKS - A SUM OF ALL THE RANKINGS FROM THE VARIOUS LOCATIONS. 4/ RANK - THE RANKING OF THE SUM OF RANKS. 5/ HIGHEST RANK - THE HIGHEST RANKING ACHIEVED BY THAT ENTRY AT ANY ONE LOCATION. 6/ LOWEST RANK - THE LOWEST RANKING ACHIEVED BY THAT ENTRY AT ANY ONE LOCATION. 7/ MAXIMUM IN TOP 25% - THE PERCENTAGE OF LOCATIONS WHERE THAT ENTRY FINISHED IN THE TOP 25% OF ALL ENTRIES.