TABLE 5C.     RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF BUFFALOGRASS (VEGETATIVE) CULTIVARS  1/
                                                                  FOR EACH YEAR IN THE U.S.
                                                                       1991-1995 DATA

                                               QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/

                                                      NAME                  1992  1993  1994   1995   1991-95

                                                      378 (NE 85-378)         3     1     1      1       1
                                                      315 (NE 84-315)         1     3     3      2       2
                                                      BUFFALAWN               2     4     7      7       3
                                                      NE 84-436               5     2     4      4       4
                                                      AZ 143                  4     6     5      6       5
                                                      609 (NE 84-609)         7     7     2      3       6
                                                      PRAIRIE                 9     5     6      5       7
                                                      HIGHLIGHT 4             6     8    10     11       8
                                                      NE 84-45-3             11    11     8      9       9
                                                      HIGHLIGHT 15            8    10    11     10       10
                                                      HIGHLIGHT 25           10     9     9      8       11

1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR
    ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 4B &4C.                    

2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC.  FOR EACH LOCATION.
    FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".