TABLE 5A. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF BUFFALOGRASS CULTIVARS 1/ FOR EACH YEAR IN THE U.S. 1991-1995 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME 1992 1993 1994 1995 1991-95 378 (NE 85-378) 3 1 1 2 1 315 (NE 84-315) 1 3 5 3 2 BUFFALAWN 2 4 17 14 3 NE 84-436 6 2 7 6 4 NTG-5 5 6 4 5 5 NTG-2 8 5 6 9 6 AZ 143 4 11 9 12 7 NTG-3 7 10 8 1 8 609 (NE 84-609) 11 12 2 4 9 TATANKA (NTG-1) 9 9 10 7 10 NTG-4 12 8 3 8 11 PRAIRIE 14 7 16 11 12 HIGHLIGHT 4 10 14 20 21 13 NE 84-45-3 19 20 18 19 14 HIGHLIGHT 15 13 17 21 20 15 TOP GUN (BAM 101) 17 15 14 15 16 SHARPS IMPROVED 16 19 13 10 17 HIGHLIGHT 25 18 16 19 17 18 PLAINS (BAM 202) 20 21 15 18 19 TEXOKA 22 18 11 16 20 RUTGERS 15 13 22 22 21 BISON 21 22 12 13 22 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 4A. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING 11111 TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".