TABLE 3C.                 RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF BERMUDAGRASS (SEEDED)
                                                   CULTIVARS AT THIRTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES  1/
                                                                         1990 DATA
                                                                             
                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/

                  NAME                    AR1    AZ1    CA2    CA3    FL1    KS2    LA1    MD1    MO4    MS1    UB1    VA1    VA4    MEAN

                  NMS 3                   4.5     1      2      1      2     4.5    1.0     1      5     1.0     1     1.0     1       1
                  NMS 4                   1.0     2      1      2      1     4.5    3.0     4      2     2.0     2     2.0     2       2
                  GUYMON                  2.0     3      7      3      3     1.0    4.0     5      1     6.5     5     7.0     7       3
                  NMS 1 (NUMEX-SAHARA)    4.5     4      3      4      4     4.5    2.0     3      5     3.0     4     4.5     3       4
                  NMS 2                   3.0     6      4      5      7     4.5    5.5     2      5     4.0     3     6.0     4       5
                  NMS 14                  7.0     5      5      7      5     4.5    7.0     6      5     5.0     7     3.0     5       6
                  AZ. COMMON              6.0     7      6      6      6     4.5    5.5     7      5     6.5     6     4.5     6       7

                  1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES), THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL
                     PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS.  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG
                     ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1.

                  2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN,
                     ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.  IF MEANS ARE TIED, THE MEAN OF THE RANKS THEY ARE TIED FOR IS USED.  FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO
                     MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".