TABLE 3.        RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF ST. AUGUSTINEGRASS
                                                     CULTIVARS AT NINE LOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES  1/
                                                                         1990 DATA
                                                                             
                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/

                              NAME                CA1     FL1     FL2     FL3     FL4     LA1     LA2     TX1     TX2    MEAN

                              FX-332              4.0     1.0     3.0     2.5     3.0     3.0     1.0    11.0     9.5      1
                              FX-261              1.0     7.0     6.0     1.0     6.0     1.0     7.5    15.5     6.0      2
                              FX-313              3.0    19.5    12.5     2.5     1.0     2.0    17.5    21.5     1.0      3
                              SEVILLE             7.5     5.0     3.0     4.0     2.0     7.5     7.5    11.0    20.0      4
                              S-6-72-107          5.0    12.0     5.0     6.0     7.0     5.0    13.0    18.5    12.5      5
                              DELMAR              9.0    19.5     1.0    12.0     9.5     7.5    17.5     9.0    12.5      6
                              MSA-20             20.5     8.0    12.5    17.5     5.0    15.0     7.5     3.5     7.0      7
                              TR 6-10 (DD-II)     6.0    23.0     9.0     7.5     4.0    10.0     7.5    23.0     3.5      8
                              MSA-11             15.0     3.0     9.0    13.0    15.5    17.0    17.5     3.5     9.5      9
                              MSA-2              14.0    13.0    16.0    16.0     8.0    19.5    13.0     1.0    21.0     10
                              JADE                7.5    15.0     9.0    14.0     9.5    15.0    21.5    21.5     3.5     11
                              FX-33              12.0    18.0    16.0    10.0    18.0     4.0    17.5    11.0     9.5     12
                              S-6-71-138         20.5     4.0    20.5    10.0    14.0    19.5     7.5     6.0    15.0     13
                              S-71-770           18.0     2.0    16.0    17.5    11.5    19.5     7.5     7.5    17.0     14
                              MERCEDES           16.5    10.5    23.0    15.0    17.0    12.5    17.5     3.5    15.0     15
                              FLORALAWN          20.5    10.5     9.0    20.0    13.0     7.5     2.5    18.5    18.0     16
                              S-71-2090          20.5     9.0    16.0    19.0    15.5    22.0    13.0     3.5    19.0     17
                              BITTERBLUE         10.5    21.0     3.0    10.0    20.0    11.0    23.0    15.5    25.0     18
                              RALEIGH            16.5     6.0    25.0    24.0    11.5    12.5     7.5     7.5    24.0     19
                              FLORATAM           24.0    17.0    20.5    21.0    19.0     7.5     7.5    13.0    22.0     20
                              DALSA 8401         25.0    16.0    16.0    22.0    22.0    24.0     2.5    15.5    15.0     21
                              TR-6-3 (DD-I)      10.5    14.0    20.5    23.0    24.0    23.0    25.0    15.5     5.0     22
                              FX-10              13.0    22.0    20.5     5.0    21.0    19.5    21.5    24.0    23.0     23
                              SUNCLIPSE           2.0    25.0     9.0     7.5    23.0    15.0    17.5    25.0     9.5     24
                              M-1                23.0    24.0    24.0    25.0    25.0    25.0    24.0    20.0     2.0     25

                              1/  THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO 
                                  DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. 
                                  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN
                                  TABLE 1.

                              2/  RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE
                                  SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.  FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE 
                                  SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".